Yaytseslav has been trending across social media platforms after controversial videos surfaced showing him approaching women in public spaces before later filming what appeared to be private interactions inside his apartment.
The clips have sparked outrage and intense debate, with many questioning the legality and ethics of his actions. Now, one of the ladies featured in the footage has broken her silence.
Speaking during a recent TikTok live session, she explained that she felt compelled to address the matter after noticing that the videos had allegedly been manipulated.
According to the woman, although Yaytseslav approached her and struck up a conversation, there was no romantic relationship or intimate encounter between them. She maintained that the storyline presented online does not reflect what actually happened.
“I did not do anything with him. I only gave him a fake number to get him off my back. I don’t even live there,” she stated, referring to the apartment seen in the video.
She claimed that after he approached her, she gave him a fake name and phone number in an attempt to discourage further contact. Her intention, she said, was simply to end the interaction politely without escalating the situation.
The encounter allegedly took place on January 14, 2026. The lady insisted that nothing private occurred and that the footage shared online had been edited in a way that suggested otherwise.
The controversy surrounding Yaytseslav has not been limited to Kenya. Reports indicate that similar allegations about his behaviour had previously emerged in Ghana, raising concerns about a pattern of conduct across different countries.
Her clarification has since sparked mixed reactions online. Some netizens expressed sympathy and said they believed that the videos could have been manipulated. Others, however, questioned her decision-making and argued that the circumstances raised doubts.
One social media user commented that not everything posted online should be taken at face value, suggesting that viewers should be cautious before forming conclusions. Another questioned why she would visit a private residence if the interaction was purely professional or casual.
Despite the divided opinions, the woman maintained her position, emphasising that she felt misrepresented and unfairly judged based on edited content.
In a separate but related account, another woman previously featured in the viral clips said she met Yaytseslav at a mall where she believed he was a potential real estate client. She explained that she later visited his apartment for what she thought was a professional discussion but left immediately when the conversation shifted away from business matters.
The unfolding saga has reignited conversations about consent, digital manipulation and privacy in the age of viral content.
According to the woman, although Yaytseslav approached her and struck up a conversation, there was no romantic relationship or intimate encounter between them. She maintained that the storyline presented online does not reflect what actually happened.
“I did not do anything with him. I only gave him a fake number to get him off my back. I don’t even live there,” she stated, referring to the apartment seen in the video.
She claimed that after he approached her, she gave him a fake name and phone number in an attempt to discourage further contact. Her intention, she said, was simply to end the interaction politely without escalating the situation.
The encounter allegedly took place on January 14, 2026. The lady insisted that nothing private occurred and that the footage shared online had been edited in a way that suggested otherwise.
The controversy surrounding Yaytseslav has not been limited to Kenya. Reports indicate that similar allegations about his behaviour had previously emerged in Ghana, raising concerns about a pattern of conduct across different countries.
Her clarification has since sparked mixed reactions online. Some netizens expressed sympathy and said they believed that the videos could have been manipulated. Others, however, questioned her decision-making and argued that the circumstances raised doubts.
One social media user commented that not everything posted online should be taken at face value, suggesting that viewers should be cautious before forming conclusions. Another questioned why she would visit a private residence if the interaction was purely professional or casual.
Despite the divided opinions, the woman maintained her position, emphasising that she felt misrepresented and unfairly judged based on edited content.
In a separate but related account, another woman previously featured in the viral clips said she met Yaytseslav at a mall where she believed he was a potential real estate client. She explained that she later visited his apartment for what she thought was a professional discussion but left immediately when the conversation shifted away from business matters.
The unfolding saga has reignited conversations about consent, digital manipulation and privacy in the age of viral content.
0 Comments