“ODM Is Not in Government,” James Orengo Declares, Raising Pressure on Party Leaders

Siaya Governor James Orengo has stirred debate within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) after publicly clarifying the party’s position regarding its relationship with the government.

In remarks widely circulated on February 26, 2026, Orengo insisted that ODM is not part of the ruling administration led by President William Ruto and that no formal coalition agreement exists between the party and the United Democratic Alliance (UDA).

“ODM is not in government,” Orengo said, emphasizing that individuals associated with the party who accepted roles within the administration did so on a personal basis rather than through an official party arrangement.

His statement has drawn attention because several ODM-linked figures have been working closely with the government, creating confusion among supporters about the party’s political direction. Orengo argued that such moves risk weakening the party’s identity as an opposition force.

The veteran politician went further to criticize leaders who joined the government without the party’s formal backing, suggesting that their decisions may have strayed from ODM’s founding principles and collective strategy.

Observers say the remarks could place pressure on influential figures within the party, including Junet Mohamed, Gladys Wanga, and Oburu Odinga, who are seen as key players in ODM’s current political structure.

Orengo also compared the situation to other political parties that formally joined the government through clear coalition agreements, such as FORD–Kenya. 

According to him, ODM has not signed any similar arrangement and should therefore maintain its independence.

Political analysts say the governor’s comments highlight growing internal tensions within ODM as the party navigates shifting alliances ahead of the 2027 General Election. 

While some leaders appear open to working with the government under a broad-based approach, others insist the party must remain firmly in opposition.

The debate reflects a larger struggle within the party over loyalty, strategy, and the direction ODM should take in the coming years. 

Supporters of Orengo’s position argue that maintaining a clear opposition identity will help preserve the party’s support base.

At the same time, critics warn that continued internal disagreements could weaken the party if leaders fail to find common ground before the next election cycle begins in earnest.